Initially emphasizes the defendant's troubled past and criminal record as grounds for guilt. Later switches his vote to not guilty simply out of boredom, prompting Juror #11 to urge him to vote with conviction.
Juror #11 confronts Juror #7's apathy, demanding intellectual honesty.
Juror #7's casual attitude clashes with Juror #8's serious pursuit of justice.
Explore the full interactive character relationship map of Twelve Angry Men